@article{oai:hsuh.repo.nii.ac.jp:00006883,
 author = {中野, 茂 and 野呂, 衣美 and 町田, 真一 and NAKANO, Shigeru and NORO, Emi and MACHIDA, Shinichi},
 journal = {北海道医療大学心理科学部研究紀要},
 month = {},
 note = {P(論文), This theoretical article reviews old criticisms to and new issues of "Theory of Innate Infant Intersubjectivity (IS)" by Colwyn Trevarthen, which is recently getting other researchers' attentions. Firstly, distinctions between rational, verbal, and interpretive IS in philosophy and IS to denote a communicative, sharing, and interacting IS in developmental psychology are made clear. Secondly, as old criticisms to IS, innateness of IS, objectivity of Trevarthen's research methodology, underestimation of parent role in a developmental process, and developmental timing of self-other identification are listed and their theoretical limitations are discussed. Thirdly, new issues of IS, the main part of this article, which include developmental continuity/discontinuity between PIS and SIS, conceptual ambiguity between SIS and Joint-Attention, and the need to consider "We-space" and "Event and Uncertainty" to approach dynamic aspects of IS rather than static synchronized IS are reviewed with related recent studies. As a conclusion, it is proposed that establishing a methodology to approach shared manifold of IS to find dynamic aspects of IS is the key for future studies.},
 pages = {25--65},
 title = {静的インターサブジェクティビティから動的インターサブジェクティビティへ : インターサブジェクティビティの発達過程の再検討},
 volume = {3},
 year = {2007}
}