@article{oai:hsuh.repo.nii.ac.jp:00006886,
 author = {川崎, 美香 and 森, 壽子 and 森, 尚彫 and 黒田, 生子 and 藤本, 政明 and KAWASAKI, Mika and MORI, Toshiko and MORI, Naoe and KURODA, Seiko and FUJIMOTO, Masaaki},
 journal = {北海道医療大学心理科学部研究紀要},
 month = {},
 note = {P(論文), As a result of we compared it in the case that we taught it to by the auditoryverbal training method (AC:A group) when we used the total communication method (TC:Bgroup) and taught many ability of a language / the recognition neuropsychology of the different native deaf children of the guidance method that wore cochlea implant(CI), and having examined it, next was found. 1. The A group which we taught it to by the AT method as compared with the B group which we taught it to by the TC method had better overall results. 2. It was language-related intelligence and vocabulary understanding and articulation ability that a clear difference was found in A group and B group. 3. It was thought that the plastic high time of the brain required that we taught it to that conducting hearing practical use enough, a method to teach it to was considered.},
 pages = {81--87},
 title = {指導方法の異なる先天性聾児の人工内耳装用効果 : 言語・認知神経心理学的諸能力の比較},
 volume = {3},
 year = {2007}
}