@article{oai:hsuh.repo.nii.ac.jp:00008122,
 author = {Inomata, Koshiro and Oota, Isao and Kurahashi, Masashi and Inomata, Koshiro and Oota, Isao and Kurahashi, Masashi},
 issue = {2},
 journal = {東日本歯学雑誌},
 month = {Dec},
 note = {P(論文), 我々は耳下腺乳頭部(以下乳頭部と略す)に見られる電位変化の性質を検索して以下の結果を得た。1)乳頭部で唾液の流れる所においた電極からは18mV位の電位差が記録されたが,その付近の粘膜上や耳下線上の皮膚等においた電極からは1mV以下の小さな電位しか記録されなかった。2)生食と唾液間の電位差を測定(6回)すると,生食と安静時唾液との間には約6mVの電位差が見られ生食と刺激時唾液との間では約2mVの電位差があった。そして前者の方がいつも高値を示した。3)舌背刺激時の乳頭部の電位変化と,その時に分泌された唾液自身にみられる電位変化を比較すると,乳頭部の電位変化の最大値は約11mVであり,安静時唾液と刺激時唾液との間では約8mV,生食と刺激時唾液では4.5mVであった。安静時唾液と刺激時唾液,又は生食と刺激時唾液との間のそれぞれの電位変化の経過は乳頭部の電位変化の経過と似た経過を示している。, We determined that a different-electrode in the flowing saliva (on the papilla parotidea) showed a potential of about 18mV, but the different-electrode on the mucous membrane (around the papilla parotidea) or on the cutis (over the parotid gland) showed much smaller potentials (lower than ImV). We confirmed the existence of electric potential differences between saline and collected saliva. The potential difference between saline and resting saliva was about 6mV, and that between saline and stimulated saliva was about 2mV. The former always higher than the latter. Comparing the electric potential changes on the papilla parotidea with other potential changes, the maximum potential difference obtained between the pailla parotidea and lobulus auriculae was about 11mV, the potential between resting saliva and stimulated saliva was about 8mV, and that between saline and stimulated saliva was about 4.5mV. The pattern of electrical changes between resting saliva and stimulated saliva or saline and stimulated saliva were similar to that of electrical changes between tha papilla parotidea and lobulus auriculae.},
 pages = {193--199},
 title = {<ORIGINAL ARTICLE>Relation between the secretory potential of parotid glands and the generated potential of collected salivas.},
 volume = {14},
 year = {1995}
}