@article{oai:hsuh.repo.nii.ac.jp:00008522,
 author = {越智, 守生 and 國安, 宏哉 and 廣瀬, 由紀人 and 伊藤, 仁 and 高島, 成悟 and 白井, 伸一 and 加々見, 寛行 and 八島, 明弘 and 鴫野, 隆博 and 神成, 克映 and 坂口, 邦彦 and 平, 博彦 and 有末, 眞},
 issue = {1},
 journal = {東日本歯学雑誌},
 month = {Jun},
 note = {P(論文), The present study investigated of the situation of oral implant therapy in Hokkaido. Information was obtained with questionnaires mailed to dentists in Hokkaido who are graduates of the Health Sciences University of Hokkaido. A total of 28 of 68 questionnaires were returned (41.2 percent), and all completed surveys were analyzed. The questionnaire asked "How many implant systems are used in your clinic? "The majority of responses was one system (50.0 percent), followed by three (25.0 percent), and two systems (16.7 percent). The most commonly used implant systems were Calcitek (21.1 percent), followed by POI and ITI (15.8 percent), then Branemark, AQB and Platon (10.5 percent). Porcelain fused to metal crowns were used more than resin veneered crowns on implant supported prostheses. At the incisor and canine, porcelain fused to metal crowns were commonly used. At the premolar, porcelain fused to metal crowns were used more often than full cast crowns. At molars, full cast crowns were commonly used. The most common retaining method of prostheses used by dentists was temporary retaining, followed by cement retaining, and screw retaining. The results of this survey suggest that aesthetic treatment is important in present day implant therapy.},
 pages = {37--54},
 title = {<臨床>北海道地区の口腔インプラント臨床の現状調査 : 本学卒業生のアンケート調査より},
 volume = {19},
 year = {2000}
}