@article{oai:hsuh.repo.nii.ac.jp:00008723,
 author = {工藤, 勝 and 大桶, 華子 and 河合, 拓郎 and 加藤, 元康 and 國分, 正廣 and 新家, 昇},
 issue = {1},
 journal = {東日本歯学雑誌},
 month = {Jun},
 note = {P(論文), We compared pain, state-anxiety, and practice results of demonstration and mutual practice in venipuncture. The subjects were 185 clinical students in the school of dentistry, Health Sciences University of Hokkaido. They were cannulated at the Cubital Fossa (CF), Distal end of the Radius (DR), or Dorsum of the Hand (DH) as demonstration on the right arm, then as mutual practice on the left with a 22G intravenous catheter. Just before the procedures, STAI was carried out. Pain was evaluated with VAS-pain , and State - anxiety was assessed by FAS (Fig.1). The STAI scores of both State and Trait anxiety were high (Table 1). The VAS points in demonstration were 38.8±20.0 (mean±S.D.) at the puncture and 34.0±23.6 at the cannulation. The VAS points in mutual practice were 50.0±23.3 at the puncture and 46.4±26.6 at the cannulation (Fig. 2). The FAS scores in demonstration were 2.16±0.97 and 2.10±1.13 at puncture and cannulation. The FAS scores in mutual practice were 2.54±1.04 and 2.44±1.14 at puncture and cannulation (Fig. 2). The VAS points, FAS scores, and percentage of failure in the mutual practice were higher than in the demonstration ; the differences in the location, minimum pain, state-anxiety, and percentage of failure were smallest for CF and highest for DH.},
 pages = {127--135},
 title = {静脈路確保に伴う痛み・不安・成功率について : 北海道医療大学歯学部歯科麻酔学講座における歯学部第5学年臨床実習・静脈路確保相互実習の検討},
 volume = {21},
 year = {2002}
}