@article{oai:hsuh.repo.nii.ac.jp:00009998, author = {北所, 弘行 and 舞田, 健夫 and 遠藤, 麻希 and 神成, 克映 and 田村, 誠 and 大桶, 華子 and 工藤, 勝 and 細川, 洋一郎 and 越智, 守生 and KITAJO, Hiroyuki and MAITA, Takeo and ENDOH, Maki and KANNARI, Yoshiteru and TAMURA, Makoto and OHKE, Hanako and KUDOU, Masaru and HOSOKAWA, Youichirou and OCHI, Morio}, issue = {2}, journal = {北海道医療大学歯学雑誌}, month = {Dec}, note = {P(論文), 北海道医療大学病院は,2005年7月1日に設備拡充して,新しくスタートした.今回,我々は,2005年7月から2006年6月の1年間に北海道医療大学病院インプラント歯科外来を受診した患者の実態を調査したので報告する.インプラント歯科外来受診者数は,51名であり,紹介患者は24名で紹介率は47%であった.インプラント手術を施行した患者は,49症例であった.インプラント手術件数は67件であり,インプラント埋入本数は201本であった.入院してインプラント手術を施行した症例は63件であった.麻酔方法は,静脈内鎮静法を併用した症例が多く,62/67症例で92.5%であった.インプラントクリニカルパスに従い,インプラント治療を行っており,患者の満足度と安心感に貢献できた治療が可能になったと考える.また,開業医でもインプラント治療が行われるようになり,それら病院より患者の紹介も増加することが予想され,さらに治療のレベルを向上させ,スタッフの充実を図る必要性が考えられた., Hospital of Health Sciences University of Hokkaido was expanded newly on July 1, 2005 and started as a new hospital. At the same time, the facilities and stuff of clinical department of implant dentistry were strengthened remarkably. In late years, the enlightenment spread to patients, who were lost of the teeth, to implant treatment spreads, and come to have a large the expectation degree of the patients. At this time, we have reported having a medical examination status of the implant patients from July, 2005 to June, 2006. We present Hospital of Health Sciences University of Hokkaido Clinical department of implant dentistry outpatient this time between one year of June, 2006 since July, 2005 because the reality of the patient who had a checkup was investigated. Clinical department of implant dentistry examination several were 51 patients, and the introduction patient was 24 patients, and the introduction rate was 47%. Patient who performed implant operation was 49 cases. Case of Implant operation was 67 cases, and implant installed numbers were 201 fixtures. The case that the patients was hospitalized, and performed implant operation was 63 cases. There was much case that used with the intravenous sedation, and the anesthesia cases were 92.5% in 62/67 cases. An implant clinical path is followed, and an implant treatment is being done, and it is thought that satisfaction of the patient and the treatment that were able to contribute to a feeling of relief were enabled. In addition, did an implant treatment with a practicing physician, and that introduction of the patient from the hospital increased was expected, and a more therapeutic level was improved, and necessity to plan substantiality of staff was thought about.}, pages = {127--133}, title = {北海道医療大学病院インプラント歯科外来の現状}, volume = {25}, year = {2006} }