WEKO3
アイテム
<原著>歯科保存修復学実習における項目別窩洞形成評価 : 第3報,前期,後期実習終了時における学生の窩洞に対する概念について
https://hsuh.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/8223
https://hsuh.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/822343505bac-2487-4ef7-9e03-7e362eb4f67c
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
<原著>歯科保存修復学実習における項目別窩洞形成評価 : 第3報,前期,後期実習終了時における学生の窩洞に対する概念について (610.2 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文(ELS) / Departmental Bulletin Paper(ELS)(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 1996-12-31 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | <原著>歯科保存修復学実習における項目別窩洞形成評価 : 第3報,前期,後期実習終了時における学生の窩洞に対する概念について | |||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | <ORIGINAL ARTICLE>A Study of Objective Assessment of Tooth Cavity Preparation at Preclinical Restorative Dentistry. : Part 3. Student's Concept to Tooth Cavity at the first and second half term | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Self-assessment | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Cavity preparation | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Preclmical dentistry | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| ページ属性 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | P(論文) | |||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||
| 著者名(日) |
豊岡, 広起
× 豊岡, 広起× 畑, 良明× 佐藤, 禎子× 莉木, 裕司× 松田, 浩一 |
|||||
| 著者所属(日) | ||||||
| ja | ||||||
| 北海道医療大学歯学部 | ||||||
| 著者所属(英) | ||||||
| en | ||||||
| Department of Operative dentistry and Endodontology, School of Dentistry, HEALTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF HOKKAIDO | ||||||
| 抄録(英) | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | From 1993, the self evaluation method for students' prepared cavities was introduced for educational improvement in operative basic practice. At first half term, an evaluation form forall practice tasks was developed. Then students prepared MO Class II type inlay cavities and evaluated those by themselves, according to the evaluation form at the end of first half term and of the second half term. Students and instructors evaluated the same MO class II inlay preparated cavity models for standarization of evaluations. The conclusions were as followed 1 At the evaluation at the end of the first half term students evaluated the prepared cavity as better than the instructors. However the difference was not statistically significant. At the end of second half term, students' evalutions still indicated better prepared cavities than the instructors' evaluations. This difference was statistically significant. 2 Preparation techniques after the second half term were poorer than that after the first half term according to the evaluation of students and instructors. 3 By discrimination analysis, the differences in evaluation of standanzed models by students and instructors was not significantly different. The results show the necessity to improve educational method further. | |||||
| 雑誌書誌ID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN0008135X | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 東日本歯学雑誌 巻 15, 号 2, p. 181-187, 発行日 1996-12-31 |
|||||
| 出版タイプ | ||||||
| 出版タイプResource | VoR | |||||
